Rehnquist v. Roberts

Interesting piece from the New York Times about the changes in the new Roberts court.

The chief justice is a more active questioner than his predecessor, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, and his style is quite different.
"Rehnquist told you what he thought," Mr. Phillips said. "He wasn't struggling to figure out the case. Roberts doesn't tip his hand as much. He asks hard questions of both sides without communicating his own preference."

In the back of my mind I kept thinking about how it seemed that Rehnquist might have just wanted to take a nap. It could be that Roberts is actually more open to argument. Does anybody with special knowledge in this area want to explain?

Share this

I assumed, from the title,

I assumed, from the title, that this was going to be about Rehnquist rising from the grave and fighting Roberts on pay-per-view for the Chief Justice seat.

Way to set me up for disappointment.