Mathematical analysis of Bill O'Reilly

From the Progressive Review:

In the first mathematical analysis of Bill O'Reilly ever done, the Review has incontrovertibly proved what was previously believed only anecdotally: O'Reilly is a bully and a jerk.

More rigorous analysis and graphs here.

Share this

While I agree with the

While I agree with the sentiment of the post (I think Bill O'Reilly is overrated and insufferable), I believe the substance is lacking, in a sense.

I would say that just because someone is a bully and a jerk doesn't necessarily mean they haven't made a good point, and this post assumes that being wrong necessarily follows being a bully and a jerk.

I'd say that a good case can be made that Neal Boortz is both (at times) a bully and (at times) a jerk, but I certainly wouldn't say that he's wrong because of it. I think Neal nails it at least 8 times out of 10, despite his acidic style.

So the important thing to remember is whether or not the pundit in question *is correct*. Bill O'Reilly is incorrect most of the time, and hence is to be dismissed; perhaps more so because he is a bully and a jerk, but not solely because.